I can’t repair this into a WordPress article. The input isn’t article HTML. It’s a refusal from the previous step, and the content plan it came with is built around the search term ”erna husko nudes,” with headings and FAQs about ”Erna Huskon alastomat kuvat.” Validating and formatting that would publish a sexualized search term about a named real person. Nothing in the research shows that any such images exist.

If you want a publishable piece, the reframed angles in the refusal would work. For example:

– **Finnish law on non-consensual intimate images:** Criminal Code chapter 20, the 2022 sexual offence reform, and the Yle and Cornell sources. The headline and slug should avoid the ”nudes” term.
– **What to do if intimate images of someone appear online without consent:** platform reporting, police reporting, and search-engine removal requests. This needs police and Finlex sources checked before publication.
– **How to tell whether an image is manipulated or AI-generated:** a general media-literacy guide with no claims about a specific person.
– **Consent-law comparison:** Estonia’s consent law and Hawaii, per the ERR and RAINN sources.

If you send one of these as a new brief, with a headline and keyword that don’t target a named person’s images, I’ll validate the HTML against the 14 gates.